First Benchmarks of AMD's Fiji GPU Surface - Open CL CompuBench Performance Beats Out the TITAN-X
One of our readers (Vladmir Lenin) stumbled onto what is probably the first legitimate benchmark of the AMD Fiji GPU. The benchmark hosted CompuBench tells u.s. almost the compute performance of the Fiji XT flagship. Related gaming benchmarks conducted in were also institute but I think its worth noting that they cannot exist completely relied upon given the inconsistent nature of GFXBench'due south Manhattan tests.
Offset compute and gaming benchmarks of AMD's Fiji XT GPU aka Radeon Fury X surfaces
GFXBench and CompuBench are 1 of the virtually reliable and near accurate sources of benchmark leaks on the internet. The fact that the suite stores hardware information taken directly from the GPU makes distinguishing false benchmarks from the real stuff, a piece of block. Today nosotros have here with us the Compute performance of the AMD Fiji GPU. The relevant CompuBench entry can exist found here. This synthetic OpenCL performance tests prove the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X (the alleged name) beating out Nvidia's GM200 powered TITAN-10 in majority of runs. Without whatsoever further ado here are the benchmarks:
At present as you tin can encounter in the three benchmarks shown that the Fiji GPU beats out the flagship TITAN-X graphic card on not only Ocean Surface Simulation but Optical Flow likewise. The card loses (desperately) in the confront detection test but its worth noting hither that face detection is a very commuter dependent test dissimilar the fairly straightforward simulation tests. It could exist that commuter changes fix this or it could be that the test doesn't similar the current implementation of GCN. The specifications of the GPU are also given, indicating that this card is indeed Fiji:
The maximum compute units given is 64, from which we tin can conclude that the Fiji die does indeed have 4096 stream processors. We besides know that this particular prototype was running on a core clock of chiliad Mhz. Clicking on gaming performance, I was able to find gaming benchmarks of the AMD Radeon Graphic Processor. However, as our readers are probably enlightened - the GFXBench OpenGL based tests are unreliable at consistently predicting gaming performance. But I am also sure they would like to have a wait regardless so the GPU score and a TITAN-X comparison is given below:
The Fiji based AMD 'Fury' graphic card scores an approximate 102.2 FPS as compared to the TITAN-Ten which scores 137.7 FPS. The Fiji die is (according to this test) roughly 25% slower than the TITAN-X. Sadly, but the Manhattan test was conducted so we don't actually have another frame of reference to be able to approximate how much of this is driver/incompatibility result, and how much of this is real performance. Delight do notation that even though the Manhattan exam is usually unreliable, in that location is a very significant possibility of this beingness close to real globe values. In any case, I am pretty happy with the compute side of this leak Not to mention this is one of the first accurate benchmarks of Fiji.
Source: https://wccftech.com/benchmarks-amds-fiji-gpu-surface-open-cl-compubench-performance-beats-titanx/
Posted by: augustinefirig1984.blogspot.com
0 Response to "First Benchmarks of AMD's Fiji GPU Surface - Open CL CompuBench Performance Beats Out the TITAN-X"
Post a Comment